From Capterra comes this great infographic showing the Top 20 Most Popular Electronic Medical Records Software Solutions.
For more on how they compiled the data go to Topping the Charts: The 20 Most Popular EMR Solutions
© 2011 Capterra, Inc.
The most comprehensive online resource for medical practice management
From Capterra comes this great infographic showing the Top 20 Most Popular Electronic Medical Records Software Solutions.
For more on how they compiled the data go to Topping the Charts: The 20 Most Popular EMR Solutions
© 2011 Capterra, Inc.

MPT Podcast 35 - 101 Ideas to Increase Revenue & Decrease Costs Part 2, with guest Mary Pat Whaley of ManageMyPractice.com. Ms. Whaley shares more of her many suggestions for increasing profit for your medical practice.
This Issue (7:30):
Click the play button to hear the podcast
If you comb through the blogosphere on the topic of electronic medical records, you may find a surprising amount of negative commentary. And if you mention the financial incentives for meaningful use implementation, things get downright testy: anti-government sentiment, conspiracy theories, and a call to resist the temptation to go paperless. They site studies that show that EMR has failed to improve practice efficiencies or control costs, as well as high failure rates leading to many doctors losing money. Why all the controversy now?
I think what we are experiencing is the high middle of the market adoption curve of these systems. There are many early adopter practices that have been successfully using EMR for years but now we are starting to see the more conservative and skeptical practitioners jump into the game, with very mixed results: failed implementations and abandonment, multiple purchases leading to significant write-offs, or incomplete implementations which are barely limping along. The culprit, according to these unfortunate practices, is conveniently the software itself.
But the high failure rate of EMR system implementation (30-50% in most studies) is not so much a reflection of the technology as a lack of knowledge of basic change management on the part of physicians. We don’t learn anything about business in medical school and we certainly don’t learn how to integrate complex technologies such as EMR into a small business. But it is a people management issue not a tool management one.
I disagree that EMR systems are by definition inefficient and that they don’t improve productivity. We have not found this to be the case in our own practice after 3 1/2 years of EMR use – and we have only begun to realize its full potential. But what most practices don’t realize is that it is just part of an overall sea-change in the way you practice medicine. Even the best EMR system cannot fix poor workflow processes – if anything, it will make them more obvious. Our EMR implementation was planned for 3 years before we went live and the software wasn’t chosen until half way through this process. Most doctors run out and buy the first EMR they fall in love with and then make their administrator try to implement it in three months – this is like buying a new tool and then trying to figure out how to use it.
Some feel that the financial incentives from the government, with complicity on the part of insurance companies, will ultimately prove to be a clever way of controlling physicians through the lens of promoting ‘better’ healthcare delivery. And true, any time that the government and private carriers agree on something, you have to pause and think. Rather than having to cull through stacks of paper charts, auditors can now make you upload your entire file set for their bots to search through.
But EMR systems are here to stay. Electronic practice management systems replaced paper scheduler and pegboard ledger books and paper medical records will soon be a thing of the past. Physicians can be resistant and be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st Century. Or they can get educated and informed, perform their due diligence, and realize that this will be the most expensive and difficult thing they will have to do in their career – besides raising kids.
Guest Post: Katie Matlack
As I settle in to my role as Medical Software Analyst at Software Advice, I’ve begun to wonder: What separates those who realize the benefits of an EMR from those who don’t? What are the critical success factors that can help ensure a practice’s switch to EMRs is truly transformational?
To find out, I spoke with representatives of three healthcare organizations where EMRs are in place:
Here are eight pieces of advice they shared with me.
1. Get Input From Your Doctors
Before you commit to switching to a particular EMR, secure buy-in from the doctors on your team. How? Solicit feedback on features they want in their EMR. Ask what’s important to them about the system they will use. In the experience of Northwest Primary Care Group in Oregon, the benefits of asking for this input were twofold. It helped them narrow-down what EMRs to even consider. And when they were later in the midst of transitioning, their doctors were on-board because the change was something that they themselves had asked for.
2. Define Who Makes Final Decisions for Your Team
While getting everyone’s input is key for garnering full support for your transition, it’s equally important to define a clear leader of the process. After the group weighs in, this leader will have the final say. The team at Northwest, whose Medical Director played this role, stressed this point. As they explained, “The doctors knew our Medical Director listened to their input, but also knew that the final decision was up to him, and they defer to him.” The takeaway? Spell out who has the final say in advance, and you’ll neutralize time-consuming power struggles and hair-splitting debates before they arise.
3. Sweat the Product Details (Then Get Them in Writing)
Before committing to buy EMR software, hammer out the details of your vendor agreement. This tip came from Hal, a practice administrator of a five-physician cardiologist group converting to a full practice management and clinicals suite. Hal, who ended up working with Oberon Medical Solutions, stressed the importance of clarifying with any vendor which modules and product versions will be included in your system. Another transaction-related tip from Hal: discuss–and get in writing–a description of responsibility for your data. If your software provider goes under, you’ll want to ensure you’ll still be guaranteed access.
4. Get Software For Your Specialty (or Plan to Customize)
Everyone I spoke with highlighted the importance of choosing a system that fits your specialty or can be easily customized to fit your practice’s needs. After all, the extent to which an EMR fits your practice will determine how much time your system will allow you to save. The Northwest team uses Vitera, a product flexible enough so a system administrator can make any changes a doctor requests within an hour. By contrast, Ian Kornbluth uses a specialty-specific solution.“The software I use, WebPT,” said Kornbluth, “was built by physical therapists, for physical therapists. Our transition process was pretty easy and painless.”
5. Phase In Hardware Ahead of Software
Learning new software can be daunting. Now imagine trying to do it while not knowing how to work a computer. For some doctors who’re new to computers, the basics of how to access files, join wireless networks, or respond to a frozen screen increases the new technology learning curve. And doctors hate to fumble in front of patients, since this might give patients misgivings about their abilities in other areas (like medicine). That’s why the Northwest team gave their doctors several months to practice at home on the specific computers they’d be using at work.
6. Have a Capable Team Create Your Records
In a paper-based office, each time a patient visits the practice there are lots of new forms to fill out. But with EMRs, you fill out a patient’s basic information just once. That places extra importance on getting the data in perfectly the first time. As Kornbluth did, you might have one staffer responsible for entering patient data and another there to check the data is accurate. It’s also important a qualified team is scanning in your documents when you’re creating those records. The team in Oregon has their regular staff members handle scanning, stressing that only staff with highly specialized training would know where to store information from a paper chart within the new record.
7. Be Systematic About Scanning Documents and Phasing-In EMR Use
Practices typically set a date to start using their EMR with active patient files. This usually means that after that date, patients have their files entered into the EMR as they come in. Most files are created through a combination of manually-entered data and scanned files accessible through the EMR. Your phase-in process might mean doctors use paper charts during patient consultations while nurses later input information from those charts into the EMR. So you’ll need to agree on a practice-wide way you’ll denote what has already been captured in your EMR and what hasn’t. A low-tech way to track what’s been scanned: “We put a diagonal line in highlighter across the front and back of sheets after they had been scanned into a patient record,” said the team in Oregon.
8. Involve Your Patients in the Switch
Patients are likely to be pleased about a system that can free up more time for you to spend with them. They’ll probably also be happy to hear an EMR can help you provide better care. It’s a definite marketing benefit if you get the right information to your patients–just be sure you tell them how their data will be secured, since one of the biggest patient concerns related to EMRs is data security. Finally, it’s also worth planning for how the new system will impact the way your doctors interact with patients. Will doctors need to turn their back to them or look away to use the EMR? Try to set up your machine so it doesn’t interfere with doctor-patient interactions.
(To read the original post, please go to SoftwareAdvice)

MPT Podcast 34 - Process or Technology – What Provides the Most Bang for the Buck?, with guest Mike Meikle of Hawkthorne Group Consulting
This Issue (6:55):
Click the play button to hear the podcast
Although most of us in medicine know the struggles of running a private practice, it is still disconcerting – albeit not surprising – to hear that some doctors are having to file for bankruptcy.
In an article on CNNMoney.com, some physicians talk about having to get business loans or use personal funds to keep their practices afloat. In some cases it is a matter of sudden changes in reimbursement policy, such as cuts in oncology pharmaceuticals; in others, it is the slow death of decreased revenue in the face of increasing costs.
For the rest of practices that are in a somewhat better situation, the annual drama in Washington DC over Medicare reimbursement has led to a paralysis in strategic planning of any kind. Doctors cannot plan for growth, for expansion, or for investment in new technology with the spectre of 30% fee cuts constantly looming over their heads.
Guest Post, John T. Kihm MD
Myths abound concerning concierge medicine (CM). Unfortunately these myths prevent good doctors from converting their practices to CM. Let’s look at those myths—maybe you need to work on yourself and your own beliefs. If you practice quality medicine your patients will value you and your work and will pay a fee to join your CM practice. CM is a value story. If you provide solid value, you needn’t believe these myths–value trumps myth.
The myths:
My patients are not wealthy. If your patients value you and your work, you can devise an affordable program. Patients will find the money to keep you if they value you. Be creative with pricing if necessary. You can make it work. Amazingly, I have patients who live in housing projects who joyfully belong to my practice because they see the value. Conversely, all of us in CM practice have wealthy patients who say the fee is too high, do not see the value, and do not join. Patient income generally does not predict CM success or failure. Perceived value predicts success. Focus on value and the rest will follow
My patients will not like this concierge idea. Do not project onto patients negative beliefs, as those beliefs may become unnecessary self-fulfilling prophecies. Patients’ enthusiasm will mirror your own. Patients possess a survival instinct and will recognize your opportunity for better care, along with your belief in providing that care. Moral: be enthusiastic! Believe in yourself and your patients will follow. Above all, emphasize value and opportunity in your CM practice.
My patients can’t do without me. Primary care doctors are famously codependent. Get over it. Patients not seeing the value in your practice can and will vote with their feet. You do not decide who can live with or without you—patients decide. Patients who truly “can’t live without me” will see the value and stay with you. There is nothing unethical about letting patients decide who they need. Do not project your own needs onto your patients. Patients who do not wish to stay with you are responsible for their own lives. Let go of your codependency.
I have bad practice demographics. You can overcome demographic obstacles by providing great value to your patients. Patients of all stripes, ages, and locations will stay with you if you take excellent care of them. For example, farmers in my practice understand, respect and value hard work. All of my farmer patients signed my contract. The elderly do tend to value their care more that the youthful, but the health-conscious young will sign-up as well. Meet demographic challenges by making sure your patients see value.
24/7 coverage sounds too hard. 24/7 sounds impressive, and it does demonstrate value. Taking call has never been easier for me. First, with fewer patients in the practice, the calls decrease in proportion to number of patients. Second, the very patients who respect and value me enough to contract with me demonstrate discretion in calling after hours. Mutual respect is the norm in CM. Inappropriate calls come few and far between, so 24/7 call is not hard.
Is this legal? What are the ethics? Concierge medicine is legal and is ethical. In CM, you provide a service for which patients pay. If you elect to file insurance, your CM practice needs to provide a non-covered service. Some argue that by charging a fee, you limit access to patients, hence CM is not ethical. Your response should be, “I need to see fewer patients to practice a high level of care. I cannot take care of all patients who need a doctor. It is not my responsibility to see all patients or attempt to cure all of society’s ills. I just focus on my own patients.” Explain this truth to your patients. They will understand you. It is ethical for you to stay alive and in business by practicing concierge medicine.
Conversion process will overwhelm me. Conversion to a concierge practice is do-able, and challenging. You have one chance to do it right. We do not recommend going it alone. Conversion need not be overwhelming. Simply ask for help.
If you know in your heart that you need a better alternative than hamster treadmill high volume medical practice, consider concierge medicine. Do not shoot-down CM based on any of the above myths. Focus on value. If you can provide value to your patients and if you want a better life for your patients and yourself, bust these myths and get going. Contact us, we can help.
Dr. John T. Kihm blogs on ConciergeMedicineDirect.com – the original article can be read at Debunking the 7 Myths of Concierge Medicine

MPT Podcast 33 - 101 Ideas to Increase Revenue and Decrease Costs, with guest Mary Pat Whaley of ManageMyPractice.com. Ms. Whaley shares some of her many suggestions for improving your practice’s bottom line.
This Issue (10:42):
Click the play button to hear the podcast
According to an article on the AMA Med News online, increased age of a physician is not necessarily correlated with resistance to EMR use. A study at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston published in JAMA found that physicians who were at least ten years out of training and busier than their younger counterparts were actually more likely to adopt electronic medical records.
Although in general doctors who were older were less likely to be using EMR it was not because of their age, according to their research. Rather, many of these physicians were not as busy as their contemporaries and less apt to take a chance on a new technology. Their conclusion: It seems to be more about attitude than age.
Practices who are implementing EMR should take this into account. It only takes one resistant doctor to scuttle an EMR project. Don’t assume that the oldest partner is the one who is going to give you trouble. Au contraire, it might be the youngest whipper-snapper who turns out to be your saboteur.
Although most people like to think that the Supreme Court is above playing politics, some healthcare experts see signs that it might be leaning towards trying to gut the national healthcare reform law. An article on UPI.com says that the high court, dominated by a 5-4 conservative majority, has shown evidence of prejudicial behavior.
While some on the right have called for Justice Kagan to recuse herself – because she was “the Obama administration’s top courtroom lawyer when the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was rammed through Congress over bitter Republican opposition” – the left are calling for Justices Thomas and Scalia to withdraw from the case before they were wined and dined by the law firm that will argue the case before the Supreme Court.
Others say that there is a high likelihood that the Court will opt to punt on the controversial case by claiming that federal law bars court challenges such as this one that are brought by the states.
Subscribe
to our articles:
Just click the orange button
Have any questions or comments? Email us at info@medicalpracticetrends.com
Copyright © 2012 · Emedikon, LLC · Privacy Policy · Sitemap · Log in