Infographic – The Top 20 Most Popular EMR Software Solutions

From Capterra comes this great infographic showing the Top 20 Most Popular Electronic Medical Records Software Solutions.

For more on how they compiled the data go to Topping the Charts: The 20 Most Popular EMR Solutions

 

The Top 20 Most Popular EMR Software Solutions

© 2011 Capterra, Inc.

Medical Practice Trends Podcast 35: 101 Ideas to Increase Revenue & Decrease Costs Part 2


MPT Podcast 35 - 101 Ideas to Increase Revenue & Decrease Costs Part 2, with guest Mary Pat Whaley of ManageMyPractice.com. Ms. Whaley shares more of her many suggestions for increasing profit for your medical practice.

This Issue (7:30):

  • Some useful tips on obtaining Meaningful Use incentives
  • Why you shouldn’t purchase an EMR just for the incentives
  • How do PQRI and E-Prescribing come into play?
  • Are there any other financial incentives or grants you can qualify for?

Click the play button to hear the podcast

Play

Right-click to download

EMR – Is It Worth It?

If you comb through the blogosphere on the topic of electronic medical records, you may find a surprising amount of negative commentary. And if you mention the financial incentives for meaningful use implementation, things get downright testy: anti-government sentiment, conspiracy theories, and a call to resist the temptation to go paperless. They site studies that show that EMR has failed to improve practice efficiencies or control costs, as well as high failure rates leading to many doctors losing money. Why all the controversy now?

I think what we are experiencing is the high middle of the market adoption curve of these systems. There are many early adopter practices that have been successfully using EMR for years but now we are starting to see the more conservative and skeptical practitioners jump into the game, with very mixed results: failed implementations and abandonment, multiple purchases leading to significant write-offs, or incomplete implementations which are barely limping along. The culprit, according to these unfortunate practices, is conveniently the software itself.

But the high failure rate of EMR system implementation (30-50% in most studies) is not so much a reflection of the technology as a lack of knowledge of basic change management on the part of physicians. We don’t learn anything about business in medical school and we certainly don’t learn how to integrate complex technologies such as EMR into a small business. But it is a people management issue not a tool management one.

I disagree that EMR systems are by definition inefficient and that they don’t improve productivity. We have not found this to be the case in our own practice after 3 1/2 years of EMR use – and we have only begun to realize its full potential. But what most practices don’t realize is that it is just part of an overall sea-change in the way you practice medicine. Even the best EMR system cannot fix poor workflow processes – if anything, it will make them more obvious. Our EMR implementation was planned for 3 years before we went live and the software wasn’t chosen until half way through this process. Most doctors run out and buy the first EMR they fall in love with and then make their administrator try to implement it in three months – this is like buying a new tool and then trying to figure out how to use it.

Some feel that the financial incentives from the government, with complicity on the part of insurance companies, will ultimately prove to be a clever way of controlling physicians through the lens of promoting ‘better’ healthcare delivery. And true, any time that the government and private carriers agree on something, you have to pause and think. Rather than having to cull through stacks of paper charts, auditors can now make you upload your entire file set for their bots to search through.

But EMR systems are here to stay. Electronic practice management systems replaced paper scheduler and pegboard ledger books and paper medical records will soon be a thing of the past. Physicians can be resistant and be dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st Century. Or they can get educated and informed, perform their due diligence, and realize that this will be the most expensive and difficult thing they will have to do in their career – besides raising kids.

How to Succeed with Electronic Medical Records:8 Tips from Real Users

Guest Post: Katie Matlack

As I settle in to my role as Medical Software Analyst at Software Advice, I’ve begun to wonder: What separates those who realize the benefits of an EMR from those who don’t? What are the critical success factors that can help ensure a practice’s switch to EMRs is truly transformational?

To find out, I spoke with representatives of three healthcare organizations where EMRs are in place:

  • Ian Kornbluth, Licensed Physical Therapist and owner of Neurac Institute and Therapy Solutions, two private practices in New Jersey.
  •  Hal Daugherty, Practice Administrator at Mobile Heart Specialists, a five-physician cardiology practice, in Mobile, Alabama.
  • Jeanette Christopher, Information System Teams Leader; Amanda Trujillo, Quality Management, Site Manager, EHR Implementation Chair; and, Samantha Walker, Medical Records Team Leader, at Northwest Primary Care Group, a 26-physician group in Portland, Oregon.

 

 

Here are eight pieces of advice they shared with me.

1. Get Input From Your Doctors

Before you commit to switching to a particular EMR, secure buy-in from the doctors on your team. How? Solicit feedback on features they want in their EMR. Ask what’s important to them about the system they will use. In the experience of Northwest Primary Care Group in Oregon, the benefits of asking for this input were twofold. It helped them narrow-down what EMRs to even consider. And when they were later in the midst of transitioning, their doctors were on-board because the change was something that they themselves had asked for.

2. Define Who Makes Final Decisions for Your Team

While getting everyone’s input is key for garnering full support for your transition, it’s equally important to define a clear leader of the process. After the group weighs in, this leader will have the final say. The team at Northwest, whose Medical Director played this role, stressed this point. As they explained, “The doctors knew our Medical Director listened to their input, but also knew that the final decision was up to him, and they defer to him.” The takeaway? Spell out who has the final say in advance, and you’ll neutralize time-consuming power struggles and hair-splitting debates before they arise.

3. Sweat the Product Details (Then Get Them in Writing)

Before committing to buy EMR software, hammer out the details of your vendor agreement. This tip came from Hal, a practice administrator of a five-physician cardiologist group converting to a full practice management and clinicals suite. Hal, who ended up working with Oberon Medical Solutions, stressed the importance of clarifying with any vendor which modules and product versions will be included in your system. Another transaction-related tip from Hal: discuss–and get in writing–a description of responsibility for your data. If your software provider goes under, you’ll want to ensure you’ll still be guaranteed access.

4. Get Software For Your Specialty (or Plan to Customize)

Everyone I spoke with highlighted the importance of choosing a system that fits your specialty or can be easily customized to fit your practice’s needs. After all, the extent to which an EMR fits your practice will determine how much time your system will allow you to save. The Northwest team uses Vitera, a product flexible enough so a system administrator can make any changes a doctor requests within an hour. By contrast, Ian Kornbluth uses a specialty-specific solution.“The software I use, WebPT,” said Kornbluth, “was built by physical therapists, for physical therapists. Our transition process was pretty easy and painless.”

5. Phase In Hardware Ahead of Software

Learning new software can be daunting. Now imagine trying to do it while not knowing how to work a computer. For some doctors who’re new to computers, the basics of how to access files, join wireless networks, or respond to a frozen screen increases the new technology learning curve. And doctors hate to fumble in front of patients, since this might give patients misgivings about their abilities in other areas (like medicine). That’s why the Northwest team gave their doctors several months to practice at home on the specific computers they’d be using at work.

6. Have a Capable Team Create Your Records

In a paper-based office, each time a patient visits the practice there are lots of new forms to fill out. But with EMRs, you fill out a patient’s basic information just once. That places extra importance on getting the data in perfectly the first time. As Kornbluth did, you might have one staffer responsible for entering patient data and another there to check the data is accurate. It’s also important a qualified team is scanning in your documents when you’re creating those records. The team in Oregon has their regular staff members handle scanning, stressing that only staff with highly specialized training would know where to store information from a paper chart within the new record.

7. Be Systematic About Scanning Documents and Phasing-In EMR Use

Practices typically set a date to start using their EMR with active patient files. This usually means that after that date, patients have their files entered into the EMR as they come in. Most files are created through a combination of manually-entered data and scanned files accessible through the EMR. Your phase-in process might mean doctors use paper charts during patient consultations while nurses later input information from those charts into the EMR. So you’ll need to agree on a practice-wide way you’ll denote what has already been captured in your EMR and what hasn’t. A low-tech way to track what’s been scanned: “We put a diagonal line in highlighter across the front and back of sheets after they had been scanned into a patient record,” said the team in Oregon.

8. Involve Your Patients in the Switch

Patients are likely to be pleased about a system that can free up more time for you to spend with them. They’ll probably also be happy to hear an EMR can help you provide better care. It’s a definite marketing benefit if you get the right information to your patients–just be sure you tell them how their data will be secured, since one of the biggest patient concerns related to EMRs is data security. Finally, it’s also worth planning for how the new system will impact the way your doctors interact with patients. Will doctors need to turn their back to them or look away to use the EMR? Try to set up your machine so it doesn’t interfere with doctor-patient interactions.

(To read the original post, please go to SoftwareAdvice)

Medical Practice Trends Podcast 34: Process or Technology – What Provides The Most Bang For The Buck?


MPT Podcast 34 - Process or Technology – What Provides the Most Bang for the Buck?, with guest Mike Meikle of Hawkthorne Group Consulting

This Issue (6:55):

  • Can technology trump poor processes?
  • How critical is the human factor?
  • Should you adapt to your EMR or should it adapt to you?
  • Why your security plan might be more important than the tools you choose

Click the play button to hear the podcast

Play

Right-click to download

Older Doctors More Tech-savvy Than Most Think

According to an article on the AMA Med News online, increased age of a physician is not necessarily correlated with resistance to EMR use. A study at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston published in JAMA found that physicians who were at least ten years out of training and busier than their younger counterparts were actually more likely to adopt electronic medical records.

Although in general doctors who were older were less likely to be using EMR it was not because of their age, according to their research. Rather, many of these physicians were not as busy as their contemporaries and less apt to take a chance on a new technology. Their conclusion: It seems to be more about attitude than age.

Practices who are implementing EMR should take this into account. It only takes one resistant doctor to scuttle an EMR project. Don’t assume that the oldest partner is the one who is going to give you trouble. Au contraire, it might be the youngest whipper-snapper who turns out to be your saboteur.

Medical Billing Software for Macs

From our partners at Software Advice comes this resource on Medical Billing Software for Macs. Although the vast majority of practices use EMR and practice management systems that run on a Windows platform, increasingly more physicians are opting for software that runs on the Mac OS.

They have a comparison of different software systems available. If you haven’t yet decided which OS to use but dream about running your practice on iPads, also check out our previous article on the iPad in the medical practice setting.

 

Current Trends in EMR

Guest Post: Emily Matthews

Electronic medical records (EMRs) in the medical office setting are growing at a faster pace than ever before. With rapidly advancing technological features and integration capabilities, it doesn’t take a master’s degree to see that using EMRs allow for more efficient and profitable management of today’s medical practice. EMRs benefit you and your patients by improving the quality of care, reducing administrative costs and allowing you to focus your time and management skills on patients and not paperwork.

Projected Growth

Analysts predict 12% annual growth in the use of EMRs in physician practices each year for the next five years. This growth and change in attitude about EMRs is mainly due to technological advances in EMRs as well as increased financial incentives for their utilization through federal and state programs. CMS currently offers incentives for the use of EMRs in both Medicare and Medicaid billing.

Technological Features

Today’s EMR is not the same as EMRs of a few years ago. Recent technological advances and added features make EMRs more useful to the efficient and expanding medical practice, especially those within medical networks. EMR interfaces are now compatible with mobile or handheld devices. This allows you or any physician or assistant in your practice to access a patient’s complete record no matter what the location or time of day. Integration features allow you as a physician to access all aspects of a patient’s chart, including pharmacy orders, radiology results, laboratory results, discharge and transfer orders and allows you to communicate electronically with payers as well. Advances in interoperability between EMRs are at the forefront of healthcare technology and are high on the priority list at the federal level. The cost of implementing EMRs has decreased, especially for practices that join as a group or within a network or health system.

Benefits to Practice Management

One of the greatest advantages to implementing EMRs in your medical practice is the reduction of cost of operating your business. By entering into an EMR system as a partnership with other physicians or practices or as a partnership with a health system, this reduces the cost of implementation and purchase of the software. While EMR software may cost an average $6,000 per physician in your office, even with a practice of ten physicians, this is less than the cost of hiring a single employee to manage hard copies of medical records for you. As your office implements an EMR, you might experience a temporary decrease in productivity as records are scanned or transferred into the system. However, this short-term loss of efficiency more than makes up for itself as the nurses, physicians and other staff in your practice familiarize themselves with the new system.

Your patients will benefit from improved quality of care as your practice implements EMRs. Improved communication between your office, coordinating facilities and payers improves the technical aspects of managing a medical practice. EMRs are at the forefront of healthcare and computing technology, and bringing this advantage into your medical practice readies you for the future.

[Emily Matthews is currently applying to masters degree programs across the U.S., and loves to read about new research into health care, gender issues, and literature. She lives and writes in Seattle, Washington.]

Blame-free System Increases Medical Error Reports

According to an article on Reuters Health, “Flagging medical errors through a system that emphasizes a lack of punishment and maintains anonymity yields more reports than a traditional method of reporting errors, a team of doctors has found.”

After introducing the new system at a pediatric clinic in North Carolina, the number of reported mistakes jumped from five to 86 per year on average.

“Getting reports doesn’t mean we’re in an unsafe practice, it means we’re addressing flaws to make us a better practice,” said Dr. Daniel Neuspiel, the lead author of the study and the director of ambulatory pediatrics at Levine Children’s Hospital in Charlotte, North Carolina.

 

 

10 Things You Hate About EMR

From the HealthcareIT News blog comes an article on the top 10 things that readers hate about electronic medical records via a Twitter thread:

  1. It doesn’t measure up to paper
  2. It’s hard to use
  3. It doesn’t provide the basics
  4. It’s cumbersome
  5. It’s ineffective
  6. It doesn’t allow for patient interaction
  7. It doesn’t protect patient privacy
  8. It doesn’t have a viable, rapid feedback loop
  9. It’s not patient-friendly
  10. It’s outdated

And then came responses from other readers who had these six reactions to those complaints:

  1. Re: It’s outdated. Most software systems are based on programming that is “outdated.”
  2. Re: Paper vs electronic. You really cannot compare the two, especially given the advantages that EMR has over a paper chart.
  3. Re: It’s cumbersome. You don’t have to live with these issues. Get educated and choose a system that does what you need it to do.
  4. Re: It’s hard to use. You had to learn how to use an iPhone the first time you used it.
  5. Complaint about using Twitter to solicit comments.
  6. Complaint about how EMR systems are not ready for prime time.

Bottom line: a lot of whining from physicians who probably didn’t perform enough due diligence and now are suffering from buyer’s remorse.

Any things you have to add to this list? Responses to the responses?