The Ten Commandments of Successful EMR Implementation

ten commandments of emr implementationMost practices breathe a sigh of relief after their new EMR software is installed and running. But now comes the hard part: getting the staff and the doctors to accept and use it. The following is a list of ten “Commandments” borrowed from our practice administrator, Don Cushing M.Ed. MBA, who has years of experience with EMR adoption with multiple practices.

(1) Thou Shalt Have a Plan. As Benjamin Franklin stated, “If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail.” But a plan is worthless if it doesn’t have a defined goal. For most practices this goal will be a successful EMR implementation – a somewhat vague goal, at best. Success should be defined in relevant, realistic, and measurable terms. These can include such things as: physicians will have the information they need when they need it, physicians will have the support needed to adapt to the new EMR system, the EMR will not interfere with the doctor-patient relationship, etc.

(2) Thou Shalt Honor the Three W’s:

  1. The hardware and software have to work.  There should be enough hardware, in the right places, and with just the right amount of capacity. Trying to be too cheap with your equipment can bite you in the end, but it is also very easy to go overboard, so get good advice. Regarding the EMR software, make sure you create a list of needs and wants before you go looking for a product. Most practices rush out and get the software, then figure out what they need – wrong move. For many smaller practices, expenses can be significantly reduced by using web-based EMR systems or cloud computing, but these tend to be less robust systems.
  2. The process has to work. If you have inefficiencies in your workflow already, an EMR system will make them more obvious (see number 3 and 4). Now is a good time to ask why you are doing things the way they have always been done.
  3. YOU have to work. Buying an EMR system is neither your first step nor your last. Most of your work should occur before your purchase but you’re not off the hook entirely after the software has been installed either. EMR implementation is a process, and it will need continual feedback and improvement to ensure its success.

(3) Thou Shalt Make Flow Charts. A critical way to make sure that everyone is on the same page is to map your processes out visually using flowcharts. There are several inexpensive programs that make it easy for your staff to collaborate and fine tune your workflow (see article on Convenience Applications). If you don’t spell this out in detail you are bound to have inefficiencies, and an EMR system will just compound them.

(4) Thou Shalt Not Expect EMR to Fix Bad Processes. A corollary to number three is that even the best EMR system cannot fix your bad workflow processes. Many times a failed EMR project is blamed on the software when in fact the problem usually lies elsewhere, but by then it is too late.

(5) Thou Shalt See the Examination Room as the Command Information Center. A common bottleneck in a practice trying to become “paperless” is an unnecessary conversion from electronic to paper (and often back again). From the exam room, all necessary tests, labs, and instructions should be able to flow with simple clicks emanating from the EMR system, and without the need for writing on a paper router, filling out paper requisitions or barking orders down the hallway.

(6) Thou Shalt Know What an EMR Is. A common cause of EMR project failure is the lack of physician buy-in, and a major reason for this is that they see it as just a digital version of a paper chart. A paper record does not have the ability to cull clinical information and transform it into actionable data, nor does it allow for enhanced communication such as sending tasks and reminders instantaneously to multiple users. On the other hand, many physicians have become accustomed to experiencing things a certain way when they use a paper chart and this does not always translate easily to an electronic one (see number 9).

(7) Thou Shalt Not Confuse Templates and Documents. Templates are the data entry forms of an EMR system and what most users see. The documents are the forms that are generated from the templates and what really constitute the official medical record. Templates are also the sexy side of the EMR and what sells the EMR to customers. And customization of the templates can make life easier, especially for less tech-savvy physicians. But customization of the templates is not as important as that of the documents, which are potentially subject to the scrutiny of an outside auditor. All to often, practices concentrate on the former to the detriment of the latter resulting in a potential liability (see number 8 and 9).

(8) Thou Shalt Consider the Inputs in Terms of the Outputs. When looking at EMR systems or customizing the one you have, it’s important to begin with the end in mind. It is easy to get bogged down in detail regarding what minutiae needs to be included in a document. Who is the reader? An associate in your group or a referring doctor? What pertinent information is needed? Long-form exam or brief clinical summary? Does it help justify the level of coding? Ensure that the critical elements are present. Everything else is probably extraneous.

(9) Thou Shalt Not Use Templates Out of the Box. In general, the easier an EMR system is to use out-of-the-box, the less flexible it will be. This may not be as critical to a new or solo practitioner who can easily adapt his or her processes to the software. But for most practices, this is like trying to fit the proverbial square peg in a round hole. Most doctors have acquired a certain gestalt when they’re looking at a paper record and much of this is lost when staring at a busy computer screen. So it’s important to approximate this is much as possible. If a prospective EMR does not have customizable templates, keep shopping. If they are customizable, then figure out a way to make them fit the way you practice medicine. Otherwise, you’re in for a lot of frustration.

(10) Thou Shalt Not Confuse Paperless With Paper-Appropriate. Some practices are so intent upon becoming paperless that they actually throw logic out the window. For example, such things as drawings and signatures are not data that need to be mined for analysis. Rather than spend a lot of money on an expensive tablet and software that allows patients to sign forms electronically, why not just have them sign a paper and scan it? The practice has what it needs and the patient keeps the paper copy – everyone’s happy.

Have you been through a successful EMR implementation (or not)? Do you have any of your own ‘commandments’ to add to the list?

HITECH Act and Medicare Incentives

 

 

From the Fox Group, a point by point overview for physician practices regarding the incentives, eligibility rules, and deadlines in the HITECH Act.

 

 

EMR News Roundup 11/15

Is Your Practice Ready To Go Paperless?

There’s no doubt that the meaningful use incentive money, made available by the ARRA HITECH Act (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act’s Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act) is drawing a boatload of attention. Under this legislation, the Department of Health and Human Service (HHS) Center for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) have set requirements for the meaningful use of healthcare information technology (HIT). If these requirements are met by eligible providers, they qualify for HHS meaningful use incentive money up to $63,750 over the next six years.

For many practices the question is not whether to go paperless to qualify for ARRA HITECH meaningful use incentives but rather, when. However, there are many factors to consider when determining whether a practice will be successful at taking the leap to 100% electronic.

A Few Questions to Consider

Is the physician practice primarily interested in receiving incentive money available through the ARRA HITECH Act?

Is the practice primarily interested in going 100% electronic, and the incentives are just a nice bonus?

Does the practice have the upfront capital to invest in a meaningful use EHR? Or does the practice require the CMS meaningful use incentive money to fund the investment?

Are the practice staff ready and eager to make the switch? Are they tech savvy?

Would the practice staff benefit from taking a slower, more measured approach to adding technology piece-by-piece into the practice?

Is the office practice prepared to scan in all patient folders to include in an EHR and devote staff time for EHR training?

The key to the ARRA HITECH Act is to increase patient safety and improve the quality of care patients receive. However, the reality is that many practices are hesitant to embark on adopting HIT. There are a variety of reasons: the belief that implementing an EHR/EMR will not provide adequate return on investment; worries that practice productivity will drop dramatically during implementation of an EHR; and the ever-looming issue of financing a new system.

Practice Options

If the practice’s long-term strategy is to go 100% paperless, this is the time to begin taking steps towards meeting CMS meaningful use requirements. Practices that adopt an EHR or EMR and demonstrate the meaningful use of the technology can be eligible for meaningful use of EHR incentive money as early as May 2011 if they are up and running with their EHR by January 2011. Eligible providers who take this route may qualify for up to $63,750 in meaningful use funds over the next six years.

Practices that wish to advantage of the ARRA meaningful use incentive money but are not prepared financially to make the dollar and time commitment required by EHR adoption can opt to install a modular EMR (electronic medical records) system which, if certified, can allow them to meet meaningful use regulations and also benefit from the incentive money. This modular approach qualifies as adoption of meaningful use EMR. As with practices that implement a complete EHR, if these practices implement their modular EMR by January 2011, they could receive CMS meaningful use incentive dollars as early as May 2011.

Providers should review and weigh all options to determine the course of action that will most greatly benefit their practice and patients. Practices that don’t pass the 100% electronic litmus test still have modular options that will keep them in the game and on their way to qualifying for meaningful use incentive funds.

By: Elinore Tibbetts

Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com

For more information, visit www.drfirst.com For more DrFirst news, visit us at blog.drfirst.com/

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

How EMR Incentives Favor Early Adopters Of EMR Software


Electronic medical records are fast replacing traditional paper records around the globe. In order to encourage doctors to transition from traditional paper records to EMR software, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) has made funds available for early adopters. This article will examine how healthcare facilities that adopt EMR software soon can receive tremendous incentives.

Beginning January 1st, 2011 the United States Government (via the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act) is offering massive incentives to physicians and medical facilities making the switch from traditional paper records to more efficient EMR software. In fact, starting in 2015 physicians who have not made the switch could start earning penalties for their failure to adopt EMR technology.

These incentives are currently being offered in order to issue in a new, more effective way of tracking patient data. Here are a few of the highlights of what a physician could receive for adopting EMR software in 2011:

1. Up to $44,000 in stimulus money from Medicare. This money can be collected over a 5 year period, with $18,000 being available the first year to physicians who meet the meaningful use standards upon initial implementation. This money is also available to each physician within a practice.
2. Up to $63,750 in funds from Medicaid. These funds can be collected over a 6 year period with $21,250 available the first year to physicians who are working toward installing an EMR system that complies with meaningful use standards. This funding is also available for each physician.
3. Avoiding penalties. Penalties will be issued starting in 2015 for physicians who have not adopted EMR software by that time. Starting in 2015 the Medicare fee schedule will be reduce by 1%, with 2% and 3% reductions to follow in 2016 and 2017 respectively. In order to avoid these penalties and receive the maximum incentive payments switching in 2011 is recommended.
4. Return on Investment. With the help of incentives EMR will also give physicians a positive ROI in a relatively short period of time. Physicians can increase their reimbursements and reduce costs associated with charts and paper records. Less clutter, more organization, and greater efficiency are just a few of the other benefits of implementing EMR software.

The earlier physicians switch, the more money is on the table. It is just a matter of finding the right company to help integrate the right software for your practice.

By: Jamie Hanson

Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com

Electronic Health Records system funding is now available for most doctors and hospitals. EHR software systems are now being required for Medicare and Medicaid providers.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

EMR Adoption Barriers: Cost, Chaos And Culture

Electronic medical records (EMR) are seen as an optimistic advancement in efficiency, productivity and workflow throughout the entire healthcare industry. EMRs help make healthcare safer and more cost effective by lowering operating expenses, streamlining documentation and eliminating errors. Despite overwhelming evidence of the benefits of EMRs, there are still physicians and hospitals reluctant to transition into the Age of Information, with as few as 17% of physicians using EMRs today. There are three main barriers that hinder the healthcare industry from EMR adoption and implementation: cost, chaos, and culture.

Implementation costs are a big hurdle to overcome in the current economy, especially for smaller practices. In addition to the price of purchase, a practice’s revenue stream may decrease temporarily due to the slowed productivity associated with physicians learning the new system. It is tempting to focus on the system’s up-front cost, rather than how much revenue it will generate for the bottom line and save the practice in the future. Efficient and properly applied systems will pay for themselves in the first one to two years of operation.

The chaos of choosing a vendor can easily deter an interested physician. There are hundreds of vendors and systems available on the market and trying to decide on one can be overwhelming and frustrating. It is difficult for many physicians to determine which specific EMR system is the best fit for their practice. Another disincentive associated with EMR implementation is the change of operations and training neededfor implementation. It is recommended to invest in a customized system that works according to the physician or facilities’ specifications, so that a potentially chaotic change is minimal and training is cost effective.

History demonstrates that culture is hesitant to change. Medicine is often referred to as the second oldest profession and since inception, physicians and doctors have used paper records. Furthermore, news of security breaches in electronic patient information encourage skepticism in physicians, wary of privacy concerns and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violations. It is important to remember that computer systems are usually very well protected, while filing cabinets, desks or paper charts are physically accessible to anyone.

The future of the healthcare industry relies on technologies like EMRs to efficiently manage practices or facilities to succeed in the Age of Information. However, there are still physicians and hospitals that are reluctant to make the transition. There are three main barriers that are holding the healthcare industry back from EMR adoption and implementation: cost, chaos, and culture. e-MDs offers a host of affordable solutions for physicians and facilities looking to modernize or enhance their services with the latest EMR technology. e-MDs is committed to providing operational solutions and delivering the clinical tools needed to succeed in today’s medical field.

By: Michael.Young

Article Directory: http://www.articledashboard.com

Ethan Luke. e-MDs powerful software can help manage your electronic medical records

 

 

 

 

 

EMR By The Numbers – A Video Infographic

 

Yes, it is a commercial for GE Healthcare, but it is still cool to watch. And for those doctors trying to convince their partners about the benefits of electronic medical records (EMR), this video does list some additional points to consider.

How much does an average doctor get to keep out of every dollar they earn? How much time is spent on non-billable activities? See why using an integrated electronic medical records (EMR) system that incorporates scheduling, billing, insurance claims management, and patient records goes beyond just proving ”meaningful use.” Watch this entertaining and informative vinfographic (video infographic) from GE Healthcare´s Centricity Advance.

How to Attest for Meaningful Use: 3 Tips from a Meaningful User

Guest Post: Houston Neal
meaningful use

 

According to an August 3 report, 2,246 eligible providers and 100 hospitals have successfully attested to meeting Meaningful Use (MU) criteria. Among these early adopters was Premier Family Physicians, a family practice here in Austin, Texas. We recently had the opportunity to speak with Dr. Kevin Spencer, a board-certified family physician with Premier Family Physicians.

In April, seven of Premier’s eligible providers (EPs) attested for MU. After the mandatory 90-day tracking period, six providers were reimbursed the full early-adopter amount of $18,000. In total, the practice has received $108,000 so far. After their seventh EP attests, the office will be on schedule to receive $308,000 in Medicare reimbursements over the next five years. Not bad for meeting just 15 criteria.

Sure, meeting those criteria does have its challenges. But it’s possible, and there are 2,246 case studies to prove it. That’s why we are running a series to profile physicians that have successfully attested. Throughout our series, we hope to shed light on the best tips and tactics for other providers. At the same time, we want to give recognition where it’s due. Dr. Spencer and the rest of the providers and staff at Premier Family Physicians have worked hard to meet MU criteria. Here are the three key factors that helped them succeed in attesting for Meaningful Use:

1. Choose the Right EHR Software Company

Choosing the right electronic health record (EHR) software vendor is one of the keys to attesting. This is one of the first lessons Dr. Spencer shared inadvertently during the interview. Dr. Spencer and the other providers at Premier use Greenway PrimeSUITE. Not only has Greenway developed a Meaningful Use Dashboard that makes it easy for providers to track compliance, but they also offer a really good training program.

“It was excellent,” said Dr. Spencer. “They put on a MU seminar right at the beginning of the year. We were trained on the things that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) wanted to measure, and how to utilize our EHR to capture the right data.”

Greenway offers support beyond training seminars. Gina Scalapino, the Director of Operations at Premier, shared a few anecdotes about her training experience. She informed me that a Greenway rep shadowed her and provided instruction on how to change her information workflow to document into the Meaningful Use Dashboard.

Of course Greenway is not the only EHR vendor that offers this level of support. There are others taking extra measures to ensure their customers meet MU criteria. But again, the key lesson is to identify one of these vendors right from the start. It will mitigate risks and challenges of the attestation process

2. Approach with the Right Mindset

Dr. Spencer really gets it, and talking with him was like a breath of fresh air. There are many Luddites still complaining about the shortcomings of EHR technology and the government’s carrots-and-sticks plan forcing them to “adopt or else.” It was refreshing to speak with a practicing physician that understands the benefits of EHRs and that is willing to work hard to reap the benefits.

Call it a sharpen-the-saw attitude. Dr. Spencer and Premier have used the MU attestation process to improve patient care and track and grade their performance.

“We’ve used this process to be an organization that [focuses on] process, workflow and measurements so that we can really attack clinical outcomes, look at our data and grade ourselves to be better physicians going forward.” – Dr. Kevin Spencer

In addition to the post-bootcamp outcomes, Premier’s patients are also benefiting from the practice’s EHR and MU attestation process. They are more educated about their disease state; they have more information available to them, and; they can be more involved in their health care. Patients can also sign up for Premier’s patient portal and check their medication lists, drug allergies, diagnosis and treatment instructions. Currently, more than 10,600 patients have registered, which is a significant level of engagement.

However, while Premier is seeing great returns from attestation so far, Dr. Spencer anticipates most benefits to come from Stage 2 of MU attestation, which is expected to be implemented in 2013.

“I think the next phase will be where we really see great benefit,” said Dr. Spencer. “Where we have information being exchanged with immunization registries between hospitals, specialists and primary care offices. Where we can avoid duplication of services and really take care of people at the right price point.”

3. Embrace the Process

Every practice needs a physician champion to take ownership of MU attestation. Someone to “embrace the process,” as Dr. Spencer and Scalapino suggested. Attesting for Meaningful Use will require behavioral changes, and practices need a campaigner to engage others and drive organizational changes.

Call it “change management” or whatever moniker you’d like to give it. But, it is important to have an individual or team to ensure providers and administrative staff understand the process and take the necessary steps to track MU criteria. They should be the central correspondent with the EHR vendor; the coordinator organizing training sessions, and; the manager articulating the importance of the process and ensuring individuals follow guidelines. It’s critical for a successful EHR implementation and similarly, for MU attestation.

Combined, these three factors helped Premier Family Physicians attest to Meaningful Use.

(To read the original post please go to SoftwareAdvice)

Medical Practice Trends Podcast 31: Why Everyone in Your Practice Needs to Know Coding


MPT Podcast 31 - Why Everyone in Your Practice Needs to Know Coding, with guest Mary Pat Whaley of ManageMyPractice.com. Ms. Whaley explains why it is important for all employees and doctors need to be on the same page when it comes to medical coding.

This Issue (7:32):

  • Why everyone in your practice needs to be well-versed in coding
  • How ICD-10 will impact your practice
  • Training staff the right way from the start
  • Pros and cons of coding ‘wizards’

Click the play button to hear the podcast

Play

Right-click to download

EMR News 10/17/2011

The Latest EMR and Meaningful News from Blogs and Social Media 10/17/2011

From Jim Tate, Meaningful Use Expert:

Do Specialists have to meet all meaningful use objectives

There are two questions from Eligible Professional specialists about the CMS EHR Incentives that I’m asked over and over again. Today, let’s answer one of them and hopefully put it to rest. Do specialists have to meet all of

From Channel Intel:

The ABC’s of Meeting Meaningful Use

If you’ve looked into implementing an electronic health record, or EHR system, you’re probably familiar with the term “Meaningful Use.” But do you really know what it means, or more importantly, the benefits it may provide you in the short and long t…

 

From the Twitterverse:

RT @ahier: NCVHS says it’s too soon to add #EHR metadata to #MeaningfulUse http://t.co/dlzAuxL8 (via @HDMmagazine)

By HITAdvisor at 10/13/2011 18:29

Data Capture Pen Gets Meaningful Use Certification http://t.co/tZN0phat #healthIT #EHR

By stevez at 10/13/2011 18:25

Advice From Early EHR Adopters

 

 

Our practice went live with our own EMR system in late 2008. For the most part, this was uneventful. The reason for this was mainly due to proper planning. And credit for our implementation plan goes primarily to our administrator, our IT director, and staff members of our appointed EMR committee. Although some of the physicians were an integral part of the committee, we tried our best not to micromanage the process. We also made the decision to gradually roll out EMR, instead of trying to convert all our patients overnight. As a result, there was no loss of productivity for the entire practice. And these days especially, every dollar counts.

It is estimated that no more than 20 to 25% of medical practices in the US are using EMR as of this writing. Why? Practices site cost, waiting for the right EHR, and concerns about recouping their investment as some of the reasons why they’re holding off on their decision. For practices that are not yet using EHR, here are some words of advice that hopefully will guide you along the way.

Doctors tend to like gadgets so their inclination is to focus on the software. This is usually a mistake. As in many technology implementations, sometimes the who is more important than the what. The following is a list of implementation steps from a guide I wrote, Navigating the EMR Jungle. Notice that the software itself is not mentioned until step 5.

  1. Decide you need to do something. Why are you doing this? The financial incentives? That’s very nice, but you need more than that to motivate your organization and see the project through to its successful end. Some other good reasons would include improving patient care, improving coding and reimbursement, improving practice efficiency.
  2. Assess your needs. What kind of system you need? Does it have to be wireless? Does it have to work between multiple offices? Other things to consider: how much you want to spend, whether or not have an in-house IT person, whether or not you want to control your own data or let it be hosted elsewhere, and what your timeline is.
  3. Form an EMR committee. This should include key members from different departments including billing, clinical, and administrative. You should also involve an IT specialist early in the process, even if it means hiring someone from the outside. Just make sure it’s someone with medical IT experience, not your nephew the tech geek.
  4. Involve the doctors. All of the doctors, especially those who are resistant to change. I’ve written previously on the dangers of naysayers; it only takes one person in a position of power to scuttle your entire project. Bottom line: grease the squeaky wheels first. This means spending extra time with them on training, answering concerns, and getting their templates up and running first.
  5. Create a short list of vendors. By this point, your EMR committee should have whittled down the plethora of software vendors to some key players. Now is the time to get the key decision-makers involved in performing demos, checking references and interviewing the companies on the short list before you ask for proposals and ultimately purchase one. Don’t rush this decision.
  6. Plan your implementation. This is a critical step in the one where many practices fail. You must find a balance between easing into a new way of doing things and not disrupting your revenue cycle unnecessarily. It’s best to allow for a gradual rollout so that the clinic and the billing office can work out the kinks. Converting all patients to EMR overnight is usually ill advised yours is a very small practice (and you only have yourself to yell at if things go bad).
  7. Organize a training schedule. With about 150 employees, it wasn’t practical for us to train everyone at the same time. We put a dozen old computers in a spare workspace and created a classroom. Staff members were rotated through training as their schedules permitted and after hours (yes, this was an overtime expense). Supervisors were tasked to audit their training and send any employee back to the process if they needed to improve upon certain skills.
  8. Run a simulation day. We credit this for uncovering some key problems that otherwise would not have been detected until we went live. We brought all of the doctors and clinical staff in on a Saturday and ran other employees through simulated check-in, work up, exam, and check out. Everyone complained about having to do this, but was thankful when the big day finally came.
  9. Go live! If you’ve done everything right up until this point, this should be anti-climactic. Nevertheless, it still stressful, especially when there is a hiccup (and hiccups should be expected).
  10. Assess current set up and plan next steps. EMR in your practice is not so much a project as a process, so constant assessment and feedback is critical. As such, there is a huge potential for improving the way you practice medicine.

I recently had the opportunity of asking members of the Large Practice Interest Group (LPIG), a workgroup comprised of 18 large ophthalmology practices that are early adopters of new technology and  management trends, for their words of wisdom for practices considering the EHR. Here’s what they had to say:

Keith Casebolt, CEO of Medical Eye Center of Medford Oregon, advises practices to “plan for training, more training, then add 25% !” His practice adopted Medflow’s electronic medical records system about six years ago. Another word of advice: there must be a specific person who “owns” the EHR, someone to stay on top of upcoming changes and who has the authority to make decisions. “Essentially [the project manager is] a new job and you need to recognize and budget for that.” He also stresses the importance of spending a lot of time in due diligence, making site visits, and attending user meetings. Lastly, make sure that you have properly assessed the level of support for this important project. “You need a lot of people rowing in the same direction, with no anchors.”

Andersen Eye Associates, in Saginaw, Michigan, is a NextGen EHR user. Kurt Beuthin, the practice CEO, says practices should get their EMR vendor to project what IT expenses are expected to cost given the size of your organization and the scope of the implementation. “Ongoing IT support costs have been more than anticipated,” he says, “and it would have been nice to have had this information from the beginning.”

Donna Davis, administrator of Atlantic Eye Physicians, in Long Branch, New Jersey, is currently involved in her second EMR conversion (and fourth practice management system conversion). She stresses the importance of keeping entire staff motivated. “We brought all key staff into the selection process and at every meeting I made sure to state what benefits the new system would give us operationally.” In contrast to other practices that I spoke with, they are planning to convert 100% of their patients when they go live upon the recommendation of their EMR vendor, IO PracticeWare.

The importance of staff training was stressed by all of the administrators. Hayley Boling, administrator of Boling Vision Center, in Elkhart, Indiana, says, “ongoing training is essential, especially for your staff that is not computer-savvy. Having qualified staff members that are able to troubleshoot issues that arise along the way is imperative. These issues happen frequently.”

In our own practice, there was significant angst when we first proposed going paperless, but that quickly changed. Ann Hotaling, Director of ASC for Ocala Eye, says, “Rest assured that the staff and physicians will give you pushback when you start your EMR project. But within a year you will get pushback from trying to hand them a paper chart. They will adapt.” She also recommends cross training your key computer staff. It is not uncommon for a networking person to be unfamiliar with the EMR software; conversely, someone who is good with the program and templates may have trouble troubleshooting a hardware glitch. It also helps for the lead technical person to be fluent enough with the clinical aspects of the EMR program to be able to communicate effectively with the physicians.

Some practices have had major problems with their EMR implementations, but their advice can be especially valuable. One partner in a four-doctor practice, who wishes to remain anonymous, said that “Ours is a case study in how NOT to implement EMR.” Their previous practice administrator chose the software, no due diligence was performed, and the doctors did not demo it prior to going live. Over time they came to the realization that software was primarily designed for solo practices, and they have had to deal with numerous technical problems including frequent software crashes. “It has been a very frustrating endeavor.” He says the choice of this particular company was in large part to try to reduce their capital outlay, but in the end it has cost them more in the long run in terms of decreased productivity. They are more than a year out and the issues are still not fully addressed. In addition, they have noted a decrease in job satisfaction among their technicians.

Below are some more pointers from our administrators (as well as a few technical considerations thanks to Kathaliya Folds from our IT department):

Before Purchasing EHR

  • Strongly consider an integrated EMR/EPM
  • Make sure it fits your workflow – this is better than trying to adapt to the software
  • Make sure can it interface with other systems you have – practice management as well as diagnostic
  • Check references; do a site visit with the same software, preferably in a practice of similar size and in your same specialty
  • The software doesn’t have to be specialty-only, but the company should have proven experience with your specialty
  • Consider ditching an old legacy system if it is not working out/cut your losses early
  • Consider software-as-a-service versus hosted locally if you are a small practice
  • Get input early in the process from a technical person – someone needs to be able to speak the same language with the EMR vendor to avoid misunderstandings
  • Make sure the specs you get from the EMR vendor are scalable and that the system will grow as your practice grows without difficulty
  • Make sure your office infrastructure can support the EMR system you want the way you want to use it – wireless devices, video streaming, multiple locations, high-resolution imaging, etc.

Implementing EHR

  • Keep your patients informed and ask for their patience
  • Have a ‘point person’ or ‘super-user’ in each location who acts as trouble-shooter and motivator
  • Use a “train the trainer” model. Have the EMR vendor train your key employees who then train the rest of your staff – these can then become your ‘super-users’ that others can turn to with their questions or problems
  • You should definitely have an EMR ‘champion’ to see the project through to the end
  • Consider having your own full-time IT person on staff
  • If you can’t afford your own IT person, hire someone locally – the EMR vendor is usually too busy to give you rapid support on most issues
  • Budget liberally for ongoing IT/EHR expenses
  • Realize that you might have to spend a little more time with the less tech savvy doctors getting them up to speed with the software
  • Take bite-sized chunks. Employee a phased rollout beginning with certain types of patients and adding other subsets as doctors and staff become acclimated.

Using EHR

  • Get patient information into the records prior to the visit if possible
  • Take advantage of template customization by doctor, by type, by type of test
  • Use macros for quick plans – they take a little work to set up but can greatly increase your efficiency
  • Take advantage of built-in capabilities such as printing out patient instructions and educational materials
  • Realize that EHR is an ongoing process and constant tweaking is required
  • Consider an audit process to ensure you are continuing to capture key exam elements, testing interpretation and history

The best advice from all of this is to seek counsel from those who have ‘been there and done that’ – don’t try to reinvent the wheel. Most practices who have been through EHR implementation are more than happy to share their experiences or host a site visit.

(If you would like to order a copy of  “Navigating the EMR Jungle,” CLICK HERE)

How a Solo Physician Aced Meaningful Use

Many physicians are anxious about taking the plunge into electronic medical records. But as this article on HealthLeadersMedia.com illustrates, if an overworked primary care doctor working solo can do it, then most of you don’t have any excuses.

Patrick Golden MD, a 55-year-old primary care doctor, admits he had a bumpy road on the way to a paperless office – he and his wife spent months scanning documents, a nurse quit, and he was facing a Medicare audit – but ultimately he did receive some financial incentive payments. He also says that his practice is running more efficiently and that his patients are more engaged in their care, thanks in part to a new patient portal that he set up.

Medical Practice Trends Podcast 29: EHR Update 1

 

MPT Podcast 29 - EHR Update 1, with guest Mary Pat Whaley of ManageMyPractice.com. Ms. Whaley brings us up-to-date on the latest in the EHR news, including the new HIPAA 5010 regulations and upcoming ICD10 coding rules.

This Issue (9:16):

  • Why doing EHR just for the money might not be such a good idea
  • How to find certified EHR vendors
  • Should you declare Meaningful Use for Medicaid or Medicare?
  • Is your EHR system compliant with HIPAA 5010 regulations?

Click the play button to hear the podcast

Play

Right-click to download