Meaningful Use – What you need to know at every stage from HIMSS
From GE Healthcare comes this video showing the current roll out of Meaningful Use Stage 1 criteria as well as Stage 2 and Stage 3 projections.
The most comprehensive online resource for medical practice management
According to an article on NetworkWorld.com, the EMR/EHR market in the US will reach $6 billion by 2015. And where there’s money, there is crime. In recent years there has been a surge in data breaches, and as medical practices move into the digitized world more and more of these cases will involve patient data.
Christopher Burgess, an expert on IT security, says that most of these breaches occur at a base level: stolen laptops or lost some drives. Some practices feel they can avoid any problems by using Web hosted EMR systems, but even this is not a sure bet. While companies that run their software in the cloud do have more sophisticated hardware and security measures, they are not invulnerable to attack. And as the covered entity, the medical practitioner has an obligation to understand just how safe his or her patient information is.
With apologies to Will Smith fans (Fresh Prince era):
Here´s what eligible providers need to know about getting incentive dollars from CMS for the meaningful use of electronic health records in under 3 minutes. The American College of Medical Informatimusicology presents the Meaningful Yoose Rap, written and performed by Dr. HITECH, aka Ross D. Martin, MD, MHA. Directed by Ishu Krishna.

MPT Podcast 21 – Leveraging the Resources of Health Information Exchanges, with guest Mike Meikle, Hawkthorne Group.
This Issue (5:08):
The HITECH Act: Electronic Health Records and Meaningful Use
This short educational animated video made by Capture Billing highlights the key features of the HITECH Act, Meaningful Use, and Stimulus Money for EHRs and what it means for you and your practice.

MPT Podcast 20 – Medical Device Regulations and EMR, with guest Mike Meikle, Hawkthorne Group.
This Issue (5:38):

MPT Podcast 19 – EHR Adoption Without Productivity Loss, with guest Pat Williams, VP of Business Development for Entrada Health
This Issue (8:04):
It seems that the importance of physician ‘buy-in’ is a hot topic these days. An article on Healthcare Technology Online, John Santangelo, director of information technology at Cleveland Clinic Florida, describes three different types of physicians as they relate to the success of EHR implementation:
These are sort of broad descriptions of the personality types you may have to deal with. But if you are the ‘champion’ of your EMR project, expect to see all manner of types across the spectrum, from down-right enthusiasm to overtly passive-aggressive. An increasingly common component in technology implementations – and EHR is no exception – is the principle of change management, or dealing with the people side of the endeavor.
What is the quickest way to figure out how to use a new electronic device? Read the manual? No – hand it to a child and let them play with it for a few minutes and show you how it works. But the converse is true as well: if you hand it to an older person and expect them to use it without proper planning, you may be asking for trouble.
Previously I have written on the pitfalls of naysayers on your EMR implementation project. These are typically partners in your group who have already decided that the practice cannot afford EMR, the incentives the government promised will never materialize, and the whole thing is just an expensive boondoggle that will bring the business to its knees. Then there are those doctors who say they are willing to go along but in reality become withdrawn or drag their feet.
Most often the cause of this behavior is their anxiety over the new technology as well as the unknown effects it might have on their practice. The majority of people over the age of forty have limited exposure to computers and the like, particularly if they are only high school graduates. But even middle-aged individuals with higher education, such as physicians, may not feel completely facile with the latest gadgets.
If this technology is complex – like an electronic medical records system – and has a significant impact on that individual’s ability to perform his or her job – seeing patients – and make a living, be prepared for downright resistance. It only takes one major stakeholder such as a partner to bring down a project of this magnitude if he or she is not fully on board, so it is best to be proactive when it comes to push-back from doctors.
Katzen Eye Group had to deal with this very issue when they went paperless with NextGen in January, 2004. Janna Mullaney, their Chief Operating Officer, says, “I usually find that older docs fight EMR because they aren’t comfortable with it; they think it’s going to slow them down and it’s just too much of a change in the way they have practiced for several decades. The trick is to make the transition easier and to get them involved early, to show them that they are going to have some input.”
In the case of our own implementation, we also chose NextGen’s EMR solution because it is fully customizable. This gave us the ability to ensure that the transition would have the least impact on individual physicians’ work schedules and productivity. Those EMR systems that are the easiest to use ‘out of the box’ may be the least flexible regarding customization and their apparent simplicity may in fact hamper the long-term success of your project [read Choosing EMR Software and get our Free EMR Software Checklist].
So what are some ways to stave off a potential mutiny when it comes to your EMR implementation? Ms. Mullaney adds the following pointers for those practices dealing with ‘buy-in’ issues from older physician partners:
Now, I realize that this is somewhat of a generalization; the issue of resistance is not strictly a generational one. There are younger physicians who are less technologically adept and therefore may balk on EMR and, conversely, there are older doctors who wholeheartedly embrace it. But regardless of whom you are dealing with, it is a good strategy to involve these individuals early in the process to allay their anxieties and to address their concerns before the situation deteriorates to an impasse.
Could Canadian physicians lose their jobs if they don’t go paperless? In an article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, a leading health administrator, speaking at an e-Health conference in Toronto, proposed that physicians in Canada face stiff penalties, including firing, if they do not adopt the use of electronic medical records systems.
According to Tom Closson, president and CEO of the Ontario Hospital Association and a member of the board of director of Canada Health Infoway:
Paying physicians who do not use EMRs is an “unfair and inappropriate use of public money,” adding that the system cannot simply afford to wait for change in the form of the retirement of a generation of doctors.
Not surprisingly, Canadian physicians were not too pleased with his position. Dr. Chris Hayes, medical officer for the Canadian Patient Safety Institute, said that health IT is “no holy grail” and that change should be accomplished through professional development initiatives, not through bureaucratic fiat. “It’s not physicians versus the administration.”







Subscribe
to our articles:
Just click the orange button
Have any questions or comments? Email us at info@medicalpracticetrends.com
Copyright © 2012 · Emedikon, LLC · Privacy Policy · Sitemap · Log in