ProtoQue is a program which was developed in response to a problem we were having with our phone triage: we noticed that many patients were not called back in a timely fashion. This program, which is web-based, lets operators register calls automatically. The patient is then subsequently passed off from there to either medical records or a medical assistant. This program manages the ‘chain of custody’ so that the patient doesn’t slip through the cracks. The issue remains open until the problem is resolved. Every time a patient receives a return phone call, a time stamp is created, so our attempts to contact them are documented. The supervisors can use this application to monitor information flow, delegating calls to additional staff if the team falls behind, regardless of where they are located. We no longer have patients waiting until the next day to have their concerns addressed by our staff. Even though our EMR system, like most, has a messaging feature, we still find this program to be more robust and have continued to use it for over three years.

In addition to the phone triage program, we have designed some in-house programs that help us manage specific tasks, and which would not be possible without our computer network:

• The first helps calculate our eyeglass prescription capture rate, which is broken down by location and individual doctor.
• We also have an optical lab tracker program, which tracks jobs in real time, so an optician can tell a patient precisely when their order will be ready.
• Another custom application completes work-orders, and is located on a network that is accessible by IT, Human Resources, and Facilities. If supplies are needed, or a piece of equipment is damaged, an employee can complete a work-order and send it on to the right person. This facilitates full accountability while the chain of custody among the departments is being managed.
• Our Human Resources staff is working on an application that will let new employees enroll using our own electronic interface.
• A new PQRI Tools program which resulted in a significant federal incentive bonus. It attaches to the practice management system and identifies missed reporting before billing.

If you have any comments, please post them here. You can also post any questions you might have about some of our software tools.

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends, 2009. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: computer network, electronic medical records, EMR, EMR implementation, EMR training, healthcare IT, HR, information technology, pqri

Even existing and proposed open-source systems such as OpenVistA still require significant investments in infrastructure on the part of the clients. And the government seems to be pushing for more open-source solutions, catching the attention of proprietary vendors like GE Healthcare, who may be offering some less-expensive options.

Still, there is a a lot of potential for EMR vendors who can target small medical practices, possibly with the SaaS (software as a service) or ASP (application-service provider) models.

Click here to read the entire article.

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends, 2009. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: EHR, electronic medical record, electronic medical records, EMR, healthcare IT, healthcare reform, information technology

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends, 2009. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: EHR, electronic medical records, healthcare IT, information technology, semantic web

For subjective-objective-assessment-plan (SOAP)-based patient care, the first generation of electronic medical records (EMR) systems worked well. Medical specialties which are primarily text-oriented tended to fare better, as compared to graphic-oriented specialties such as ophthalmology. At our practice we have used an EPM since 1983. But although this software met our needs for billing and scheduling, we were still accumulating stacks of paper records which required an increasing expense just to store the paper.

As we considered a change to an electronic medical records system, our practice compared the expected costs for paper records storage to the costs of converting to a new system. We fully understood that we’d have to become more efficient to make the transition cost-effective.

System Implementation Costs include:

* Infrastructure
* Consulting
* Software
* Hardware
* Tech Support

We also included the cost of additional work-hours which will be spent training people on the new system, along with data entry. In most cases a practice uses both the old and new systems concurrently until the entire conversion is complete. In the meantime, there could be some redundant tasks.

The primary factor in our decision to switch to EMR was based on the need to reduce the growing mass of paper we were storing. And it didn’t hurt to hopefully ride the wave of financial incentives from the government for EMR implementation. Meanwhile, there was the opportunity to proactively implement new HIPAA privacy and security guidelines in a way that would work best in our practice.

System Benefits Include:

* Improved Communication
* Better Efficiency
* Improved Compliance
* Enhanced Documentation
* Justifiable Coding
* Improved Integration

At our practice, the business choice came down to the belief that we could recoup our investment in approximately five years. This calculation was based on the savings of projected storage space costs, along with reduced needs for printing expenses and services. The journal Health Affairs found that the average primary-care practice recovered its costs in 30 months.

It is more difficult to measure the value of change to job efficiency and changes in staffing patterns, but we are monitoring these factors to accurately measure returns on our investment. Some studies have shown reductions in medical records staffing of 0.25 – 0.5 full-time equivalents (FTEs) as well as significant savings in dictation costs.

The overall trend seems to be toward a world where EMR is the norm. Insurance companies and government are placing more pressure on health-care providers to standardize medical records, and EMR could soon become obligatory. Costs are dropping as more businesses adopt the technology; soon even the smallest practices may find it cost-effective to ‘go paperless’.

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends, 2009. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: digital practice, EHR, electronic medical records, EMR, EMR implementation, EMR training, HIPAA, information technology, paperless practice

Nevertheless, an article on Software Advice offers some more reasons to consider making the switch to paperless, including

1. Savings on chart pulling costs. Several studies have calculated that it can cost as much as $4 to pull or create a paper chart. Beth Israel Hospital in (...)
Read the rest of Can EMR Save You Money? (186 words)

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends, 2008. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: information technology, IT, software

While a larger practice may have the resources for full-time IT personnel, what is a smaller group or solo practice to do?

IT is not just one narrow field, but many categories rolled into one, just as medicine comprises many distinct specialties. So, you may require different IT services depending on your practice’s needs.

But first, there are some things you need to consider before hiring your potential IT consultant or firm:(...)
Read the rest of Outsourcing Information Technology (348 words)

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends, 2008. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: EHR, EMR, information technology, IT outsourcing