Medical Practice Trends.com » meaningful use

CMS Meaningful Use Rules, Part 3

Peter Polack — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:00:08 +0000

In part 1, we discussed just what is meant by a meaningful user and in part 2 we touched briefly on some of the changes made in the meaningful use rules from the proposed rules to the final rules. Whereas initially there was an 80% threshold that had to be met for pretty much every objective, after much discussion and consideration, CMS agreed that for some of these measures that was too high a bar to jump.

Here is a nice summary of the final rules thresholds for each of the meaningful use objectives and measures. Thanks to Robin Raiford, RN, from the HIMSS Legislation and Regulation Review Task Force, for providing us with this great resource.

It’s too detailed to see clearly on the website so….

RIGHT-CLICK HERE to download the PDF file

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2010. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: EHR, electronic medical record, electronic medical records, healthcare IT, meaningful use

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

CMS Meaningful Use Rules, Part 2

Peter Polack — Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:06:30 +0000

In part 1, we introduced the different stages of meaningful use criteria as defined by CMS in their final rules, released July 13, 2010. Many practices and hospitals breathed a collective sigh of relief on the one hand, as several criteria had thresholds that were less onerous than were originally proposed. It seems that CMS has been listening.

Thresholds for CPOE and e-Prescribing

For example, as we mentioned earlier, the threshold for meeting criteria for CPOE (computerized physician order entry) is now set at 30%. This means that only 30% of unique patients (not total patient visits) need to have at least one order entered into the electronic medical record system to meet those goals.

Another example is electronically transmitted prescriptions or e-Prescribing. Originally set at 75% of “permissible prescriptions”, this has been dropped to “at least 40%”. This was due in part to objections that (1) some pharmacies are not quite ready to accept e-Prescribing and (2) some patients insist on getting a paper prescription.

Structured Data vs Unstructured Data

Along the subject of prescriptions, an active medication list must be maintained on patients (with the default threshold of at least 80% of unique patients) in the form of “structured data”. Structured data refers to data that can be identified by the EMR system. In other words,

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2010. | Permalink | 2 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, EHR, electronic medical record, EMR, meaningful use

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

CMS Releases EHR Adoption Rules, Part 1

Peter Polack — Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:00:36 +0000

On Tuesday July 13, CMS released the final rule for adopting a certified electronic health record (EHR) system.

After listing about 60 acronyms and abbreviations (and it’s impossible to remember them when reading the subsequent text), what follows is approximately 800 pages of proposals, related comments, and final rulings.

All this is to spell out the meaning of meaningful use (which we first touched on in October ), how to be considered an EP (eligible professional) and when said EP can expect to first receive any kind of incentive payment – for the early adopters, the first “payment year” is calendar year (CY) 2011.

When you actually receive the payment could be the end of the following calendar year). Hospitals will typically be incentivized on a fiscal year (FY) basis.

We’ll attempt to digest this compelling tome, one 100-page piece at a time (or so). Keep in mind, though, that this is only what CMS considers “Stage 1″ of the meaningful use criteria. Stage 2 criteria are expected by the end of 2011 and Stage 3 criteria by the end of 2013. The idea is to have an “initial graduated approach to arriving at the ultimate goal”: total enlightenment of EMR, I suppose.

As we previously mentioned, a meaningful user is one who:

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2010. | Permalink | 5 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, CMS, EHR, HITECH, meaningful use, medicare, Stage 1 criteria, Stage 2 criteria, Stage 3 criteria

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

CMS to Publish “Meaningful Use” Final Rule by July 14

Peter Polack — Fri, 02 Jul 2010 14:59:31 +0000

According to a report on FierceEMR.com, the CMS has announced that by July 14 it will release its final ruling on the EMR “meaningful use” standards which will finally spell out just how healthcare providers can become eligible for the HITECH (Healthcare Information for Electronic and Clinical Health) Act financial incentive payments.

In addition, it will presumably unveil its plan for aligning its Physician Quality Reporting Initiative (PQRI) with the EMR financial incentives program.

“We propose to include many ARRA core clinical quality measures in the PQRI program, to demonstrate meaningful use of EHR and quality of care furnished to individuals,” CMS states in an advanced copy of the proposed reg, CMIO magazine reports. “We propose the selection of these measures to meet the requirements of planning the integration of PQRI and EHR reporting.”

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2010. | Permalink | One comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, CMS, EHR, EMR, HITECH, meaningful use, pqri

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Bonus Resource: How to Qualify for EMR Stimulus Funds

Peter Polack — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:30:24 +0000

One of the most common questions we get is, “How to we qualify for the financial incentives for EMR implementation?” Even so, we would think this should be everyone’s number one question. After all, the costs of both the EMR software and the associated hardware are not insignificant. Who is going to pay for all of that? You are.

But what if the government gave you a nice, fat check for your efforts? Say, about $44,000 per provider over the next five years?

Ah, but there is a catch. Or, several catches to be exact. These fall under the area of what is known as “meaningful use“. In order to qualify for these funds, a provider must be able to show he or she has met certain goals or objectives.

Medical Practice Trends has partnered with the folks at SoftwareAdvice.com to give you a guide on How to Qualify for EMR/EHR Stimulus Funds.

Click Here for more information

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2010. | Permalink | 3 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, EHR, electronic medical records, EMR implementation, meaningful use

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Study: Current EMRs not good for care coordination

Frank Polack — Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:15:17 +0000

One of the goals of meaningful use and all the related federal spending of health IT is for EMRs to improve care coordination. But the current reimbursement system that’s heavy on fee-for-service encourages software developers and users alike to focus on documentation of billable events rather than coordination of care, a new study finds.

CMS Releases Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria

Peter Polack — Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:32:51 +0000

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced today a proposed outline for Meaningful Use criteria, in accordance with EMR implementation provisions under the Health Information Technology for Clinical and Economic Health (HITECH) Act, part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009. These specify some of the guidelines by which physicians can receive incentives of up to $44,000 per provider, over 5 years, beginning as early as 2011.

Stage 1 criteria (the first of 3 total) would cover 25 meaningful use objectives (and 23 for hospitals). These are listed under modules known as Health Outcomes Policy Priorities such as Improving quality and patient safety (use of drug-allergy interaction checks, use of ePrescribing, maintaining active medication list, etc.), Engaging patients and their families in their health care (e.g., provide patients with a copy of their health information), Improving care coordination (e.g., exchanging key clinical information among authorized entities), Improving population and public health (e.g., capability to submit data to immunization registries), and Ensuring adequate privacy and security for personal health information (through the use of appropriate EMR technology).

The implementation of Stage 1 meaningful use standards would begin in 2011. Stage 2 (which would essentially expand upon certain aspects of Stage 1) and Stage 3 (which would deal with achieving improvements in conditions of a national high-priority nature and population health outcomes) would follow later.

While this certainly doesn’t clear things up completely for the individual physician, every piece of information that trickles down from Washington is eventually analyzed and translated for all parties which have a vested interest in the process. Hopefully, resources such as this can help doctors stay informed and as up-to-date as possible.

If you have any comments or questions, please post them here. If we don’t know the answer we’ll certainly try to find someone who does.

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2009. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, CMS, electronic medical records, EMR, healthcare IT, HIPAA, HITECH, meaningful use

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

The Meaning of Meaningful Use of EMR

Peter Polack — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:15:29 +0000

If you talk to anyone who is involved in the electronic medical records (EMR) industry, one of the biggest points of discussion is what is known as “Meaningful Use of EMR.” What started as a well-intentioned (by some) effort to establish standards for EMR software systems has morphed into political jockeying by corporations, consumer watchdogs, and others.

The US Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS) outlined these criteria for Meaningful Use of EMR:
1)   Improve quality, safety, efficiency, and reduce health disparities
2)   Engage patients and families
3)   Improve care coordination
4)   Improve population and public health
5)   Ensure adequate privacy and security protections for personal health information

And although each of these has defined goals followed by specific objectives and measures for the years 2011, 2013, and 2015, these still sound a bit ambiguous. Many industry experts, however, expect these to be more fine-tuned as the dates approach, but medical practices will have to stay informed to keep ahead of the curve.

Financial Incentives

As part of the ARRA (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009), financial incentives will be given to those physicians whose practices demonstrate “meaningful use” beginning January, 2011.

The incentive payment, according to CMS, is equal to 75% of Medicare-allowable charges for covered services in a given year, and maxes out as follows:

Year 1 – $15,000
Year 2 – $12,000
Year 3 – $8,000
Year 4 – $4,000
Year 5 – $2,000

For those practices who are early adopters of the technology and hit the threshold for meaningful use in 2011 or 2012, the first year payment would be $18,000. Note that this only applies to Medicare; there are additional incentives for healthcare providers who have a certain threshold of Medicaid patients and/or who practice in a rural area. The threshold for office-based pediatricians is lower, and so they would be more likely to qualify for those additional funds.

[table courtesy of SoftwareAdvice.com]

Even considering the fact that EMR implementation may cost anywhere from $10,000 to $50,000 per provider, these incentives would certainly make that investment more palatable.

Those practices that procrastinate, however, will be penalized with cuts in Medicare and Medicaid payments:

2015 – 1%
2016 – 2%
2017 – 3%
2020 – 5% (maximum reduction)

So, how do you know if you qualify? According to the health IT blog NetDoc, to be a “meaningful EHR user”, a physician must satisfy three criteria:

Must use “certified EHR [EMR] technology”
Must demonstrate that the certified EHR technology is connected in such a way that it provides for the electronic exchange of health information to improve the quality of health care, such as promoting the coordination of care (using HL7 or XML standards)
Must submit information on clinical quality measures specified by HHS (such as PQRI)

Some physicians have told me that because there isn’t a final definition of what is considered “certified EHR technology” they are just going to wait. Big mistake. Most health care IT experts working on and advising on this issue feel fairly strongly that the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) will set CCHIT (Certification Commission for Health Information Technology) criteria as the standard for EMR certification.

CCHIT is a non-profit organization funded by various corporations and groups such as the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians, and was recognized by the US Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS) as a certifying body in 2006.

Some critics, however, charge that CCHIT is a shill for the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), the healthcare industry’s membership organization focused on healthcare IT. Although made up of both corporate and individual members, these critics feel that their goal is to corner the market for certain major EMR players. Nevertheless, unless or until there is an alternative, most EMR vendors are using CCHIT certification as the benchmark.

In addition to the EMR certification criteria, the ONCHIT is expected to adopt an initial set of standards and implementation specifications by the end of the year 2009.

Timeline

So, is too late to implement EMR in your practice and still qualify for the financial incentives? Well, that depends on the size of your practice, type of specialty, and how motivated your doctors and staff are to go paperless. Just don’t expect to run down to Office Depot, buy an EMR program and launch it the next day (although there is talk about WalMart getting into the EMR business, but we’ll leave that story for another day…)

According to MBA HealthGroup, these are some reasonable time frames to expect for EMR Implementation:

Stage 1 – up to 6 months – researching vendors, getting buy-in, setting up an EMR committee, checking out demos, and making a final decision on the EMR system
Stage 2 – up to 5 months – time it will take to actually ‘go live’. In the meantime, adapting workflow to EMR system you chose, ordering hardware, and standardizing processes
Stage 3 – between 6 and 12 months – amount of time it will likely take to achieve “meaningful use”, which includes ePrescribing, documenting electronically, and ability to report certain items (which are still being determined)

[timeline courtesy of MBA HealthBlog]

Smaller groups and solo doctors may be able to purchase a more basic, “out-of-the-box” EMR system and more quickly adapt their workflow to the system, rather than vice versa in the case of larger medical practices. But, the one thing you can count on with EMR implementation is that you can’t count on anything – that is why some sort of timeline is important [see EMR Implementation Rollout].

What this boils down to is that those practices that have already started implementing EMR will have a good shot at getting those higher financial incentives. On the other hand, physicians who have been wishing that the whole idea of EMR was just a fleeting fad may not only miss out on these incentives but may also face cuts in their reimbursement.

Questions? Comments? Post them below

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2009. | Permalink | 5 comments | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, CCHIT, EHR, electronic medical record, EMR, healthcare IT, HIMSS, HITECH, meaningful use, ONCHIT

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh

Putting Meaningful Use in Your Practice

Peter Polack — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:10:22 +0000

A recent article in the AMA news discussed some of the continued ambiguities of the “Meaningful Use” prerequisites handed down by the Health IT Policy Committee. Nevertheless, it does give everyone an idea of where they are headed. Generally speaking, meaningful users are defined as healthcare-providers who are using E-Prescribing, that their EMR technology is connected in such a way that there is an electronic exchange of health information, and that clinical quality measures are submitted to the government via electronic means.

For practices that fail to have meaningful use by the end of the set timelines, not only would there not be incentives, there would actually be penalties in the form of reductions in Medicare reimbursements – unless the practice could demonstrate some type of financial hardship that would prevent adoption of EMR.

If you don’t think the financial incentives are worthwhile, thing again. SoftwareAdvice.com has a nice explanation of what medical practices have to gain by getting the ball rolling and not waiting until the perfect EMR solution falls out of the sky and hits them in the heads (note: it ain’t gonna happen).

To give you an idea of the timeline we are talking about, here is a graphic from a committee report (courtesy of Digitized Medicine). So, what are you waiting for?

Tweet This Post

© Emedikon LLC for Medical Practice Trends.com, 2009. | Permalink | No comment | Add to del.icio.us
Post tags: ARRA, EHR, electronic medical record, electronic medical records, EMR, EMR implementation, HITECH, meaningful use, physician incentives

Feed enhanced by Better Feed from Ozh